MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055547178 · doi:10.1063/1.1461890

Time-resolved luminescence and photoconductivity of polycrystalline ZnO films

2002· article· en· W2055547178 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Studenikin, Michael Cocivera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescenceMicrosecondExcitonMaterials sciencePhotoconductivityExcitationAcceptorAtomic physicsNanosecondVacancy defectMolecular physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryOptoelectronicsOpticsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relative intensities of the green and blue luminescence of a ZnO film was shown to depend on the excitation regime. Time-resolved and steady-state luminescence were studied along with photoconductivity transients. Under continuous excitation the film emitted green light, while under pulsed excitation the luminescence was either blue or green, depending on the intensity of the excitation pulse. The intensity of the blue component depended linearly on the pulse intensity while the green intensity followed a sublinear power law dependence with the exponent α=1/3. The transient luminescence exhibited fast (below nanosecond) and slow (microsecond) decay components at room temperature. The fast component was ascribed to interband exciton recombination, and the slow component was attributed to an electron-hole recombination involving a donor-acceptor complex, which most likely consisted of oxygen and zinc vacancies. In this model, the complex can emit light only when it is activated, i.e., oxygen vacancy is in its singly ionized state and the acceptor (zinc vacancy) captures a hole. The density of the activated complex depends on the Fermi level position, bend bending, and thickness of the depletion layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations252
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207