MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055556793 · doi:10.1049/ip-vis:20045062

Robust image watermarking using a chirp detection-based technique

2005· article· en· W2055556793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal Processing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatermarkDigital watermarkingRobustness (evolution)ChirpComputer scienceParametric statisticsDetectorArtificial intelligenceBenchmark (surveying)Hough transformComputer visionAlgorithmImage (mathematics)MathematicsTelecommunicationsOpticsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new robust image watermarking algorithm that embeds multiple watermark bits in the host image is proposed. Linear chirps are embedded as watermark messages, where the slopes of the chirp on the time-frequency (TF) plane represent watermark messages, such that each slope corresponds to a unique message. The Hough-Radon transform (HRT) is a widely used tool to detect directional elements that satisfy a parametric constraint in images. Since linear chirps are localised as a straight line in the TF plane, the HRT is used to detect the watermark messages at the receiver. The HRT acts as an error correcting scheme and robustly estimates the slope of the chirps in the presence of any attacks. It is found that the HRT based detector is able to detect the watermark message accurately when the bit error rate is less than 20%. The robustness of the proposed scheme has been evaluated using the checkmark benchmark attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it