MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055605340 · doi:10.1080/09540260050007417

Pain, psychogenesis, and psychiatric diagnosis

2000· article· en· W2055605340 on OpenAlexaff
Harold Merskey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Psychiatry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMental Health and Psychiatry
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)PsychiatrySelection (genetic algorithm)MedicinePsychologyMedical literatureClinical psychologyComputer sciencePathologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The principles of medical classification are discussed. Psychiatric classification shares with the rest of medicine an inability to be totally systematic. Medical classification achieves comprehensiveness at the cost of specificity. The definition of pain is discussed and the interrelationships of selection factors and psychogenesis are reviewed as psychological causes of pain. Problems with the term somatizing are then considered. As a result, abandoning the term is proposed. Finally, the status of Pain Disorder in DSM-V is appraised. Although there is a need for the category, only a small number of cases should meet the criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of PsychiatrySame topicMental Health and PsychiatryFrench-language works237,207