Cell wall differentiation during early somatic embryogenesis in plants. I. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy study on embryos originating from direct, indirect, and adventitious pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In three modes of somatic embryogenesis, direct (Cichorium), indirect (Citrus), and adventitious (Asparagus), a layer enveloped the proembryo and separated it from parenchyma or callus cells. This layer was either torn or partly dissolved during embryo expansion and led to a reticulated fibrillar structure linking the peripheral cells of the embryo prior to protoderm differentiation. Scanning electron microscopic and transmission electron microscopic analyses revealed it as a net-like structure composed of thick fibres restricted to the embryo surface during a specific developmental stage. Stereo pairs of micrographs revealed its two-dimensional arrangement. The spatio-temporal localization of this fibrillar network defined it as an intermediate stage of somatic embryogenesis in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species irrespective of their modes of development. Hypotheses concerning the origin of the fibrillar network are provided, and its possible functions during somatic embryogenesis are discussed.Key words: Asparagus officinalis L. (asparagus), cell wall, Cichorium (chicory), Citrus (Troyer citrange), somatic embryogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".