MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055660683 · doi:10.1155/2000/687809

Electrospray‐mass spectrometric studies of selectivity of alkali metal cations extraction by calix[4]arene crowns

2000· article· en· W2055660683 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spectroscopy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersUniversité de Moncton
KeywordsElectrospray mass spectrometryAlkali metalElectrospraySelectivityExtraction (chemistry)ChemistryCalixareneMass spectrometryMetalInorganic chemistryNuclear chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryMoleculeCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI/MS) has quickly become a versatile method of qualitative analysis of a wide variety of host–guest complexes formed in solution. However, considerable controversy exists on how ESI spectra quantitatively reflect and compare to the results obtained on these complexes. The extraction of alkali cations from acidic aqueous solutions by nine various calix[4]arenes‐crown‐6 diluted in NPOE, was studied by using ESI/MS. The stoichiometry of cesium complex and Cs + /Na + selectivity were evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it