064 Proliferation and Growth Factor Exression of Human Keratinocytes on Microcarrier Beads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human keratinocytes have been extensively used for the treatment of large body surface area burn injuries. We have studied the potential for treating non‐thermal, chronic wounds with keratinocytes grown on microcarrier beads placed into porous retrievable bags. The current studies were undertaken to examine the growth characteristics of these cells on Cytoline‐1™ microcarrier beads, and how this growth correlated with the expression of growth factors. Human keratinocytes were expanded in Keratinocyte Basal Medium‐2 with standard supplements (Clonetics, Inc.). The cells were trypsinized and added to Cytoline‐1™(Pharmacia Biotech) beads at 13.3 × 10 6 cells per mL pre‐equilibrated beads. The beads were seeded into roller bottles and cultured in a humidified 37° C incubator for up to two weeks. Cell numbers were monitored by direct cell counting on the beads following hematoxylin staining; and by protein and DNA content. Aliquots of media were also assayed for levels of PDGF and VEGF by immunoassay (Quantikine R , R&D Systems). Keratinocytes showed a lag in growth with a sustained decrement in cells per bead from 456 to 346 cells/bead by day 7. This was followed by a robust growth response to 551 cells/bead by day 11. These values correlated with total cellular protein (994, 738, and 1164 ug); and DNA content. The secretion of PDGF and VEGF by human keratinocyte under these conditions, did not directly correlate to the cell number but rather indirectly to the increase in cell number after the 7 days of stagnant growth. These results suggest that the vulnerary effect observed with human keratincytes on microcarrier beads is dependent on acculturation of the cells to the microbead environment, after which they begin to express elevated levels of growth factors important for healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".