Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le baroque érotique chez Tournier délimite un espace de plaisir original où corps textuel et langue des héros se croisent en écho et jouent d'effets spéculaires qui relèvent d'une esthétique baroque. L'expression d'un appel à la fois corporel et mystique des héros, l'ambivalence sexuelle exhibée comme un jeu, un écart ou une folie, se nouent, quant à elles, en une langue érotique et persuasive qui invente sa propre économie libidinale. Nous observerons les différentes procédures visant au ravissement, au savoir ambidextre et s'inscrivant dans une topologie baroque érotique qui fascine par sa perversité polymorphe et jouisseuse du réel. Dans ce continuum littéraire, le baroque érotique se définit comme une double vocation de l'oeuvre, laquelle propose un nouveau genre et préfigure un érotisme où se rassemblent les attributs ambigus et les formes rituelles de l'Éros baroque tourniérien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".