Eulerian Framework for Inelasticity Based on the Jaumann Rate and a Hyperelastic Constitutive Relation—Part I: Rate-Form Hyperelasticity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An integrable Eulerian rate formulation of finite deformation elasticity is developed, which relates the Jaumann or other objective corotational rate of the Kirchhoff stress with material spin to the same rate of the left Cauchy–Green deformation measure through a deformation dependent constitutive tensor. The proposed constitutive relationship can be written in terms of the rate of deformation tensor in the form of a hypoelastic material model. Integrability conditions, under which the proposed formulation yields (a) a Cauchy elastic and (b) a Green elastic material model are derived for the isotropic case. These determine the deformation dependent instantaneous elasticity tensor of the material. In particular, when the Cauchy integrability criterion is applied to the stress-strain relationship of a hyperelastic material model, an Eulerian rate formulation of hyperelasticity is obtained. This formulation proves crucial for the Eulerian finite strain elastoplastic model developed in part II of this work. The proposed model is formulated and integrated in the fixed background and extends the notion of an integrable hypoelastic model to arbitrary corotational objective rates and coordinates. Integrability was previously shown for the grade-zero hypoelastic model with use of the logarithmic (D) rate, the spin of which is formulated in principal coordinates. Uniform deformation examples of rectilinear shear, closed path four-step loading, and cyclic elliptical loading are presented. Contrary to classical grade-zero hypoelasticity, no shear oscillation, elastic dissipation, or ratcheting under cyclic load is observed when the simple Zaremba–Jaumann rate of stress is employed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".