MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055737639 · doi:10.1115/1.4027118

A New Surgical Barbed Staple for Minimally Invasive Surgery1

2014· article· en· W2055737639 on OpenAlexaff
Farhad Javid, Damiano Pasini, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Devices · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Sutures and Adhesives
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarbed sutureMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standard suturing is an inevitable but time-consuming pro-cedure in all surgical operations. In minimally invasive (MI) surgery, since the complex knot-tying maneuvers are extremely tedious, suturing is even more challenging. Knotless fixation implants are, therefore, developed to eliminate the conventional suturing procedure in surgical operations. Barbed sutures [1], sur-gical staples, and self-closing clips [2] are widely used in open surgical operations. Moreover, special surgical systems such as the Endo Stitch device, the SILS Stitch articulating device, and the Multifire Endo GIA stapler are designed to replace sutures in a variety of MI operations. These devices, however, are not suitable for precise MI surgery in small operation sites since they require considerably large insertion holes and extensive operating cav-ities. A novel surgical barbed staple and its insertion system, to be used in precise MI operations, are introduced in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical DevicesSame topicSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesFrench-language works237,207