MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055744007 · doi:10.1017/s1079898600004194

Sergio Fajardo and H. Jerome Keisler . Model theory of stochastic processes, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 14. Association for Symbolic Logic, A K Peters, Ltd., Natick, Massachusetts, 2002, xii + 136 pp.

2004· article· en· W2055744007 on OpenAlexaff
Alasdair Urquhart

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Symbolic Logic · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical logicAssociation (psychology)Model theoryPhilosophyMathematicsMathematical economicsArtificial intelligenceHumanitiesComputer scienceEpistemologyAlgorithmDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sergio Fajardo and H. Jerome Keisler . Model theory of stochastic processes, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 14. Association for Symbolic Logic, A K Peters, Ltd., Natick, Massachusetts, 2002, xii + 136 pp. - Volume 10 Issue 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Symbolic LogicSame topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207