Women’s Experiences With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, because of the advanced nature of the disease at the time of diagnosis, will face the very real possibility of an early death. Thus the disease can have a significant impact on women who play a central role in the day-to-day management of family life, the nurture of children, and the care of extended family. This article reports the perspectives of women living with ovarian cancer regarding their experiences confronting recurrent disease. For this qualitative study 18 women were interviewed. Four primary themes emerged from the analysis of the verbatim interview transcripts: waiting for recurrence, facing the diagnosis of recurrence, managing treatment-related concerns, and attempting to regain control. The practice implications for oncology nurses involve understanding the significant meaning associated with monitoring tumor markers and recurrent disease, assisting women in accessing information and support, and engaging in sensitive communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it