MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055781100 · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(11)73863-9

A bias-oriented treatment approach: The metacognitive training for schizophrenia patients (MCT)

2011· article· en· W2055781100 on OpenAlexaff
Steffen Moritz, Todd S. Woodward

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Mental Health & Substance Use ServicesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoeducationPsychologyCognitionDelusionSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychotherapistMetacognitionCognitive remediation therapyConvictionMindfulnessIntervention (counseling)Clinical psychologyCognitive therapyCognitive biasPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until recently, psychological therapy for schizophrenia was considered inefficient or even harmful by many clinicians. The reservation against psychotherapy is partly rooted in the assumption that delusions are not amenable to psychological understanding. However, meta-analyses suggest that cognitive intervention is effective in ameliorating schizophrenia symptoms. In addition, evidence has accumulated that cognitive biases, such as jumping to conclusions (JTC), are involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia positive symptoms, particularly delusions. A recently developed group program, called metacognitive training (MCT), is presented targeting cognitive biases. The MCT is a hybrid of psychoeducation, cognitive remediation and cognitive-behavioural therapy. Patients are taught strategies how to identify and defuse “cognitive traps”. The program can be downloaded at no cost at www.uke.de/mkt and is currently available in more than 20 languages. New evidence on the feasibility and efficacy of the MCT is presented. At the end, a novel individualized variant entitled MCT+ is demonstrated targeting individual delusional ideas. A random-controlled study asserts the efficacy of the MCT+ to reduce JTC as well as delusion severity and conviction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean PsychiatrySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207