EMG Signal Decomposition Using Motor Unit Potential Train Validity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A system to resolve an intramuscular electromyographic (EMG) signal into its component motor unit potential trains (MUPTs) is presented. The system is intended mainly for clinical applications where several physiological parameters of motor units (MUs), such as their motor unit potential (MUP) templates and mean firing rates, are of interest. The system filters an EMG signal, detects MUPs, and clusters and classifies the detected MUPs into MUPTs. Clustering is partially based on the K-means algorithm, and the supervised classification is implemented using a certainty-based algorithm. Both clustering and supervised classification algorithms use MUP shape and MU firing pattern information along with signal dependent assignment criteria to obtain robust performance across a variety of EMG signals. During classification, the validity of extracted MUPTs are determined using several supervised classifiers; invalid trains are corrected and the assignment threshold for each train is adjusted based on the estimated validity (i.e., adaptive classification). Performance of the developed system in terms of accuracy (A(c)), assignment rate (A(r)), correct classification rate (CC(r)) , and the error in estimating the number of MUPTs represented in the set of detected MUPs (E(NMUPTs)) was evaluated using 32 simulated and 30 real EMG signals comprised of 3-11 and 3-15 MUPTs, respectively. The developed system, with average CC(r) of 86.4% for simulated and 96.4% for real data, outperformed a previously developed EMG decomposition system, with average CC(r) of 71.6% and 89.7% for simulated and real data, by 14.7% and 6.7%, respectively. In terms of E(NMUPTs), the new system, with average E(NMUPTs) of 0.3 and 0.2 for simulated and real data respectively, was better able to estimate the number of MUPTs represented in a set of detected MUPs than the previous system, with average E(NMUPTs) of 2.2 and 0.8 for simulated and real data respectively. For both the simulated and real data used, variations in A(c), A(r), and E(NMUPTs) for the newly developed system were lower than for the previous system, which demonstrates that the new system can successfully adjust the assignment criteria based on the characteristics of a given signal to achieve robust performance across a wide variety of EMG signals, which is of paramount importance for successfully promoting the clinical application of EMG signal decomposition techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".