MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evidence For The Existence Of A Constitutive Nitric Oxide Synthase In Vascular Smooth Muscle

2002· review· en· W2055852663 on OpenAlexaff
L. S. Cheah, MCE Gwee, R Das, H. J. Ballard, YF Yang, EE Daniel, C.Y. Kwan

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaveolaeNitric oxide synthaseVascular smooth muscleNitric oxideChemistryContractilityEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiochemistryBiologyMedicineCellSmooth muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. We have identified a neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-like constitutive form of NOS in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) using a functional contractility approach as well as immunohistochemical methods. 2. N(G)-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, N(G)-monomethyl-L- arginine and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG), the competitive inhibitors of NOS, inhibited Mg(2+)-induced relaxation of de-endothelialized rat aorta precontracted with phenylephrine (PE). This Mg(2+) relaxation of VSM was not affected by inhibitors of inducible NOS. 3. Electrical field stimulation (EFS; 30-70 Hz) caused relaxation of rat aorta in the presence of tetrodotoxin (therefore not a neurogenic effect) and this EFS relaxation was effectively inhibited by L-NOARG, oxyhemoglobin and methylene blue. 4. Immunohistochemical studies of dog saphenous vein using antibodies raised against neuronal NOS indicated prominent staining along the plasmalemma in a punctate pattern similar to the distribution of antibodies against caveolin-1, a major constituent of the plasmalemmal caveolae. 5. We propose that a constitutive NOS of non-endothelial, non-neuronal origin is present in a special caveolae domain of VSM cell membranes and could be activated by an ionic mechanism yet to be characterized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and PhysiologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207