Parameter Identification of a Quasi-Dimensional Spark-Ignition Engine Combustion Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Parameter identification of a math-based spark-ignition engine model is studied in this paper. Differential-algebraic equations governing the dynamic behavior of the engine combustion model are derived using a quasi-dimensional modelling scheme. The model is developed based on the two-zone combustion theory with turbulent flame propagation through the combustion chamber [<span class="xref">1</span>]. The system of equations includes physics-based equations combined with the semi-empirical Wiebe function.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The GT-Power engine simulator software [<span class="xref">2</span>], a powerful tool for design and development of engines, is used to extract the reference data for the engine parameter identification. The models is GT-Power are calibrated and validated with experimental results; thus, acquired data from the software can be a reliable reference for engine validation purposes. Homotopy optimization procedure, in which the original differential equations are modified by coupling the experimental data to the mathematical model using a homotopy parameter and gains, has been utilized in this work to obtain a global minimum for the parameters giving the best match to experiments [<span class="xref">3</span>]. Algebraic equations in the mathematical model of the engine make the process of optimization more complicated, as the algebraic relations should be satisfied in updating the initial conditions at every step of the applied optimization procedure.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The parameters chosen are difficult to estimate due to the lack of a tangible physical significance, e.g. the coefficients used in empirical relations in the two-zone combustion model. The primary results obtained from parameter identification of the dynamic model show the efficacy of the proposed optimization procedure and computation algorithm. </div></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".