Chemical functionality of poly(methylenephosphine): phosphine–borane adducts and methylphosphonium ionomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chemical functionality of poly(methylenephosphine) n-Bu[MesP-CPh2]nH (2) is examined in reactions with two isoelectronic species, namely BH3 and CH3+. The potential reactivity of polymer 2 is modelled by examining the reactivity of molecular phosphines bearing similar substituents as the polymer. In particular, the phosphine-borane adducts Mes(Me)P(BH3)-CPh2H (4a) and Mes(Me)P(BH3)-CPh2SiMe2H (4b) are prepared from the reaction of BH3.SMe2 with Mes(Me)P-CPh2H (3a) or Mes(Me)P-CPh2SiMe2H (3b), respectively. Treating 3a with MeOTf affords the methylated model compound, [Mes(Me)2P-CPh2H]OTf (5). X-Ray crystal structures are reported for each model compound. The reaction of n-Bu[MesP-CPh2]nH (Mn = 3.89 x 10(4), PDI = 1.34) with BH3.SMe2 affords the phosphine-borane polymer n-Bu[MesP(BH3)-CPh2]nH (6) (Mn = 4.13 x 10(4), PDI = 1.26). In contrast, methylation of phosphine polymer 2 gives n-Bu[MesP-CPh2]x-/-[MesP(Me)-CPh2]yH.(OTf)y (7) where approximately 50% of the phosphine moieties are methylated (from 31P NMR).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".