MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055886136 · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.571

Redevelopment and evaluation of EpiData: A practical software tool for use in the public health field

2010· article· en· W2055886136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Arthur, Javier Sádaba Garay, B. Guarda, Lee E. Sieswerda, Adam Stevens

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentrePublic Health Agency of CanadaToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthAgency (philosophy)MedicinePublic health informaticsMedical educationInternational healthHealth policyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: EpiData Entry and EpiData Analysis are key tools for case and outbreak data management, both in Canada and internationally. Based on field input and pilot testing, the full scope of EpiData capability has yet to be realized. This project focuses on the development and evaluation of standardized tools used for epidemiological training and field management of outbreaks on an national and international scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.146
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.146
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207