Multivariate analysis of single quadrupole LC‐MS spectra for routine characterization and quantification of intact proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern high-throughput proteomic platforms allow incomparable protein mixture resolution and identification. However, such sophisticated facilities are expensive and not always accessible for routine analysis of simple mixtures. In this paper, we propose a simple methodology, based on detection of intact, nondigested proteins by LC coupled to single quadrupole MS (sqLC-MS), followed by the analysis of the resulting spectra by multivariate analysis (MA). By doing so, even large molecular weight (MW) proteins, generating complex spectra, can be characterized to a level that allows isoform discrimination, while standard algorithms, such as MS spectrum deconvolution, cannot. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we have analyzed the spectra of a set of purified, intact albumins from seven different organisms (bovine, human, rabbit, rat, sheep, mouse, and pig) as a model of microheterogenous proteins, using Projection to Latent Structure Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA). Although these proteins are very similar (less than 1% difference in MW), sqLC-MS/MA allowed their classification, and the identification of unknown source samples. In addition, MA allowed precise protein quantification from the same data (calibration curve R2 = 0.9966). The ability to rapidly characterize and quantify proteins, together with simplicity and affordability, could make of combined sqLC-MS/MA a routine method for the characterization of simple mixture of known proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".