MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055920772 · doi:10.1142/s012918310200384x

A NEW METHOD FOR CALCULATING THE FUNCTIONAL DERIVATIVE δT<sub>c</sub>/δα<sup>2</sup>F(Ω): APPLICATION TO MgB<sub>2</sub>

2002· article· en· W2055920772 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Mitrović

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics C · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSuperconductivityCoupling (piping)Convergence (economics)Hermitian matrixDerivative (finance)PhysicsPhononFunction (biology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Condensed matter physicsApplied mathematicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new method for calculating the functional derivative of the superconducting transition temperature Tc with respect to the electron–phonon coupling function α2F(Ω). The method relies on a highly efficient procedure for finding the largest eigenvalue and the corresponding eigenvector of a Hermitian matrix. The convergence problems that arise in the calculation of δTc/δα2F(Ω) for systems with low Tc and a large maximum phonon frequency Ωmax using the method based on the pair-breaking parameter are eliminated. We apply the new method of calculating δTc/δα2F(Ω) to MgB2, to the prototype strong coupling superconductor Pb and to weak coupling (BCS) superconductor Al.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics CSame topicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and AlloysFrench-language works237,207