MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055921949 · doi:10.1063/1.2168689

Large-order behavior of the perturbation energies for the hydrogen atom in magnetic field

2006· article· en· W2055921949 on OpenAlexaff
J. Zamastil, L. Skála

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWKB approximationSemiclassical physicsHydrogen atomDegeneracy (biology)Perturbation (astronomy)PhysicsPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Quantum mechanicsMagnetic fieldMathematical physicsMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum electrodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-order behavior for the perturbation energies of the hydrogen atom in magnetic field is derived. By means of the dispersion relations, the large-order behavior of the series is determined by calculating the lifetime of the quasistationary states in an imaginary magnetic field. This problem is treated by means of the modified multidimensional WKB method. The asymptotic formula for the perturbation energies derived by Avron is generalized to the states with an arbitrary degeneracy. The first order correction to the resulting formula is also found. Thus, the multidimensional WKB method is for the first time explicitly carried out beyond the leading approximation. The analytical results are verified numerically and an excellent agreement between the two is found. The connection between our and conventional semiclassical approximation is also briefly discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207