MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055922525 · doi:10.1021/jm0508437

Docking of Aminoglycosides to Hydrated and Flexible RNA

2006· article· en· W2055922525 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Moitessier, Éric Westhof, Stephen Hanessian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoDockChemistryDocking (animal)Searching the conformational space for dockingNucleic acidRNAMacromoleculeForce field (fiction)Intermolecular forceMolecular dynamicsComputationMoleculeComputational chemistryStereochemistryBinding siteAlgorithmBiochemistryComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although much effort has been devoted to the development of programs suited for the docking of ligands to proteins, much less progress has been achieved in the nucleic acid field. We have developed a unique approach for docking aminoglycosides to RNA considering the flexibility of these macromolecules using conformational ensembles and accounting for the role of the first hydration shell. This concept, successfully implemented in AutoDock, relies on the computation of the intermolecular interaction energy that accounts for the presence of dynamically bound water molecules to the RNA. As an application, a set of 11 aminoglycosides was docked with an average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 1.41 A to be compared with an average RMSD of 3.25 A when the original AutoDock protocol was used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations113
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207