Liberté individuelle et contraintes matérielles : une approche conceptuelle de la pauvreté énergétique en Belgique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La pauvreté énergétique a été conceptualisée comme une injustice environnementale par Walker et Day (2012). Notre papier se situe dans le prolongement de cette approche, et l’inscrit de façon critique à l’intérieur de la réflexion menée par Amartya Sen sur les capabilités (1999, 2009). Nous montrons combien, d’une part, l’idée de justice de Sen qui repose sur la notion de capabilité peut être pertinente pour penser la justice énergétique et environnementale, mais combien, d’autre part, cette approche demeure insuffisante pour penser la transition écologique. Nous proposons un cadre conceptuel dans lequel une voie démocratique de transition serait possible. Pour cela, nous proposons de penser la liberté et l’imagination sociale dans un cadre non libéral avec le concept d’autonomie de C. Castoriadis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".