MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055986277 · doi:10.1063/1.1407291

Operator formulation of centroid dynamics for Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac statistics

2001· article· en· W2055986277 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Blinov, Pierre–Nicholas Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperator (biology)BosonCentroidPhysicsFermi–Dirac statisticsQuantum mechanicsQuantum statistical mechanicsMathematical physicsStatistical physicsQuantumMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is devoted to the development of an operator formulation of the recent extension of the centroid molecular dynamics method [J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3647 (1999); 111, 5303 (1999)] to boson and fermion systems. An operator calculus is used to rederive the basic equations of centroid dynamics. The following generalization to the case of systems of many indistinguishable particles is based on the use of a projection operator. Two different definitions of the quasi-density operator for bosonic and fermionic systems are suggested. The first definition allows an exact evaluation of equilibrium properties for systems with exchange effects using classical-like molecular dynamics calculations. The second one provides a formal justification of Bose–Einstein/Fermi–Dirac centroid dynamics with the same set of approximations as for Boltzmann statistics, and can be used to extract quantum dynamical information. In this case, the corresponding centroid correlation function can be related to a double Kubo transformed quantum mechanical one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207