Operator formulation of centroid dynamics for Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac statistics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the development of an operator formulation of the recent extension of the centroid molecular dynamics method [J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3647 (1999); 111, 5303 (1999)] to boson and fermion systems. An operator calculus is used to rederive the basic equations of centroid dynamics. The following generalization to the case of systems of many indistinguishable particles is based on the use of a projection operator. Two different definitions of the quasi-density operator for bosonic and fermionic systems are suggested. The first definition allows an exact evaluation of equilibrium properties for systems with exchange effects using classical-like molecular dynamics calculations. The second one provides a formal justification of Bose–Einstein/Fermi–Dirac centroid dynamics with the same set of approximations as for Boltzmann statistics, and can be used to extract quantum dynamical information. In this case, the corresponding centroid correlation function can be related to a double Kubo transformed quantum mechanical one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".