MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

De l’appropriation inachevée du concept de genre en communication organisationnelle

2004· article· fr· W2055988796 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication et organisation · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAppropriationSociologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La communication organisationnelle, comme discipline et comme objet d'étude et d'intervention, s'est développée de façon particulièrement intense depuis la dernière moitié du XXIe siècle. L'introduction du concept de genre (gender) dans les sciences sociales à partir des années 1970 a connu un succès aussi remarquable qui a toutefois tardé à s'affirmer dans cette discipline disséminée en grande partie dans les départements et les écoles de gestion, de communication et de psychologie. Les résultats d'une recherche théorique exploratoire parmi la documentation anglaise publiée entre 1977 et 2003 montrent que le concept de genre a participé, au cours de cette période, à l'avancement des connaissances en communication organisationnelle, même si sa compréhension a été parfois limitée et que son appropriation n'a été, en général, que partielle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it