MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056019705 · doi:10.2118/163816-ms

Evolution of Drilling and Completions in the Slave Point to Optimize Economics

2013· article· en· W2056019705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsPenn West Exploration (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringDrillingDirectional drillingSoftware deploymentGeologyCompletion (oil and gas wells)Permeability (electromagnetism)Point (geometry)Production (economics)Computer scienceEngineeringEconomicsMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper will detail the technological evolution of drilling and completion practices utilized to optimize economic development of the Slave Point carbonate platform specifically in the Evi and Otter fields in northern Alberta. The Slave Point platform was initially targeted for conventional production via vertical wells in the early 1980s. Success was marginal due to the unpredictability of localized porosity development. As a result, full scale commercial development of this resource was deemed uneconomic due to poor reservoir quality. More recently, however, horizontal drilling and multistage fracturing technology has allowed operators to open up lower porosity horizons to improve flow capacity, improve recoveries, and allow for commercial development from zones previously deemed as uneconomic. The Slave Point has a greater thickness and is less permeable than other tight rock plays in Alberta such as the Cardium and Viking. It produces high-quality, light oil with low water and solution gas production rates. Despite high estimates of original oil in place of approximately 3 to 10 MMbbl per section, horizontal well rates are still challenged due to lower permeability through the pay section. In this regard, the continued deployment of innovation and technology has been critical in improving well production performance, compressing project costs, and ultimately optimizing project economics. The focus of this paper is solely upon one of the major Slave Point operators who has drilled 49 horizontal wells accounting for 200,000 m (656,000 ft) drilled and 1,350 fracture stages in the Evi and Otter Slave Point fields since 2008. This operator has continually deployed advancing technologies to improve project economics. The information will be presented in terms of the influence of technology on well design, the optimization and deployment of the various technologies, and the demonstrated improvement on productivity and reserve recovery. The discussion will focus on three development phases outlined below, which highlight the progression from vertical to horizontal technology. Vertical AppraisalSingle Lateral DevelopmentDual Lateral Development The case studies presented will clearly demonstrate the production impact upon the utilization and application of these technologies. The methods and lessons learned through the use of dual laterals, open hole junctures and open hole multistage systems can be applied to other unconventional formations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it