MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056053013 · doi:10.1115/sbc2009-206152

Multiphoton Microscopy of Healthy and Aneurismal Human Ascending Aorta

2009· article· en· W2056053013 on OpenAlexaff
Stacey L. Meadley, Umakanta Tripathy, Paul W. Wiseman, Richard L. Leask

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastinAscending aortaAortaAneurysmBlood flowAortic aneurysmAnatomyChemistryBiophysicsMedicineCardiologyPathologyBiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ascending aorta (AA) is the largest artery in the human body. It is responsible for transporting blood between the heart and the rest of the body. The structure of the AA allows it to withstand the resulting blood flow forces. This unique structure is due primarily to the proteins collagen and elastin. Collagen accounts for the strength of the aorta while the mechanical properties of the tissue, under healthy physiological conditions, is dominated by the elastin. Aneurysms are the primary disease associated with the AA, where the diameter of the vessel increases over 1.5 times its original size. Aneurysms can result in severe blood flow disturbances or rupture of the AA and almost always require surgical intervention. The development of an aneurysm is due to a weakening of the aortic wall, specifically the degradation of the structural proteins. This study examines the changes that occur to collagen and elastin in the ascending aorta with aneurysms using multiphoton microscopy. Specifically, the orientation of collagen fibers and the morphology of the fenestrations in the elastic lamina are compared between healthy and dilated human ascending aortas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and BSame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207