MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056057306 · doi:10.1039/c3ee41016a

Improving the regeneration of CO2-binding organic liquids with a polarity change

2013· article· en· W2056057306 on OpenAlex
Paul M. Mathias, Kash Afshar, Feng Zheng, Mark D. Bearden, Charles J. Freeman, Tamer Andrea, Phillip Koech, Igor V. Kutnyakov, Andy Zwoster, A. Smith, Philip G. Jessop, Omid Ghaffari Nik, David J. Heldebrant

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Environmental Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarity (international relations)SolventHexadecaneInertChemical engineeringSolvent polarityPolarity reversalIonic liquidChemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a solvent regeneration method unique to CO2-binding organic liquids (CO2BOLs) and other switchable ionic liquids: utilizing changes in polarity to shift the free energy of the system. The degree of CO2 loading in CO2BOLs is known to control the polarity of the solvent; conversely, polarity can be exploited as a means to control CO2 loading. In this process, a chemically inert nonpolar “antisolvent” (AS) such as hexadecane (C16) is added to aid in de-complexing CO2 from a CO2-rich CO2BOL. The addition of this polarity assist reduces the temperature required for regeneration of our most recent CO2BOL, 1-((1,3-dimethylimidazolidin-2-ylidene)amino)propan-2-ol by as much as 73 °C. The lower regeneration temperatures realized with this polarity change allow reduced solvent attrition and thermal degradation. Furthermore, the polarity assist shows considerable promise for reducing the regeneration energy of CO2BOL solvents, and separation of the CO2BOL from the AS is as simple as a cooling the mixture to promote phase separation. Based on vapor–liquid and liquid–liquid equilibrium measurements of a candidate CO2BOL with CO2, with and without an AS, we present the evidence and impacts of a polarity change on a CO2BOL. Equilibrium thermodynamic models and analysis of the system were constructed using Aspen Plus®, and forecasts of preliminary process configurations and feasibility are also presented. Lastly, projections of solvent performance for removing CO2 from a subcritical coal-fired power plant (total net power and parasitic load) are presented with and without this polarity assist and compared to the U.S. Department of Energy's Case 10 monoethanolamine baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it