Analysis of Resonance Transitions in X-Ray Spectra of Electron Interaction with Highly Charged Iron Ions.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In electron interactions with highly charged Fe ions, the X-ray spectra were theoretically analysed and compared with the experimental results at the Tokyo EBIT. In the present analysis, cross sections for dielectronic recombination, resonance excitation, resonance recombination, and direct excitation were calculated by use of the distorted wave method. Simulated spectra were obtained by convoluting the calculated cross sections with the experimental beam energy resolution and X-ray detector resolution, which are in close agreement with the experimental observations. Based on our calculations including polarization effects, we estimate the charge state balance: He-like Fe24+ (74%), Li-like Fe23+ (18%), and Be-like Fe22+ (8%), and the ion density in the trap to be 6.5−8.5 × 108 cm-3. The present calculations were also compared with the previous high-resolution measurements of the KLL resonances in He-like Fe ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".