MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056081012 · doi:10.1211/00223570263

Rapid effect of progesterone on the contraction of rat aorta in-vitro

2002· article· en· W2056081012 on OpenAlexaff
Meili Zhang, G J Wang, Christina G. Benishin, Peter K.T. Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContraction (grammar)Internal medicineEndocrinologyAldosteroneAortaNitric oxideChemistryIn vitroEndotheliumInhibitory postsynaptic potentialSteroidHormoneMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Progesterone induced rapid relaxation of KCl-induced contraction of rat aortic rings. The relaxant effect of progesterone on aortic rings was concentration-dependent (over the range of 10(-10) to 10(-5) M) and partially dependent on the endothelium. Application of a nitric oxide (NO) synthase antagonist N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 10(-5) M) after progesterone treatment partially inhibited the relaxant effects of progesterone. This suggested that part of the effect was through the production of nitric oxide. Washing out the steroid hormone in the bath solutions could quickly reverse the inhibitory effects of progesterone on phasic tension generation in aortic rings. Five minutes after washout, the tension generation in aortic rings was completely restored. Cultured endothelial cells from rat aorta increased release of NO into culture media in response to a 60-min exposure to progesterone. Aldosterone and dexamethasone were also tested, and failed to relax KCl-induced contraction of aortic rings. These data suggest that the vascular effects of progesterone are not mediated by a genomic action of this steroid, and that the vascular effects are mediated partially through endothelial NO production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy and PharmacologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207