MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056082536 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v62i3.791

Identifying Missed Opportunities to Curtail Antimicrobial Therapy for Presumed Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score

2009· article· en· W2056082536 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sean K Gorman, Lynne-Michelle M Stewart, Richard S Slavik, Jane de Lemos, Dean R. Chittock, Vinay Dhingra, Juan J. Ronco, Harjinder Parwana

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthProvidence Health CareInterior HealthVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuationMedicinePneumoniaIntensive care unitAntimicrobialVentilator-associated pneumoniaIntensive care medicineInternal medicineObservational studyAdverse effectEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Early discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia can reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, the occurrence of adverse drug events, and the cost of therapy. Evidence suggests that discontinuation of therapy by day 3 may be appropriate for patients with a clinical pulmonary infection score of 6 or less at baseline and on day 3.Objectives: To determine the proportion of patients eligible for antimicrobial discontinuation on day 3 and day 7 of therapy and to determine the proportion of eligible patients for whom antimicrobials were discontinued within these timeframes.Methods: A 6-month observational study was conducted from October 3, 2005, to March 31, 2006, in a 27-bed medical–surgical tertiary care intensive care unit. Clinical pharmacists attended daily rounds and prospectively identified patients for inclusion in the study. A study pharmacist retrospectively calculated clinical pulmonary infection scores. Other data were obtained from the quality-improvement database and patient health records for the intensive care unit.Results: Ninety-two patients were treated for ventilator-associated pneumonia during the study period, of whom 49 were included in the analysis. At day 3, 17 (35%) of the 49 patients were eligible for early discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy, but therapy was discontinued for only 2 (12%) of these 17 patients. At day 7, 10 (32%) of 31 patients were eligible for antimicrobial discontinuation, but therapy was discontinued for only 1 (10%) of these 10 patients.Conclusions: A significant opportunity exists at the authors’ institution to develop and implement an antimicrobial discontinuation policy that uses the clinical pulmonary infection score to guide antimicrobial use for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.RÉSUMÉ Contexte : L’arrêt précoce de l’antibiothérapie dans les cas de pneumonie sous ventilation assistée pourrait réduire l’apparition de résistance antimocrobienne, la survenue d’événements indésirables liés aux médicaments et le coût du traitement. Des données suggèrent que l’arrêt du traitement au jour 3 pourrait être approprié chez les patients présentant un score d’infection pulmonaire clinique de 6 ou moins au début et au 3e jour du traitement.Objectifs : Déterminer la proportion de patients admissibles à l’arrêt de l’antibiothérapie, aux jours 3 et 7 du traitement, et la proportion de ces patients dont l’antibiothérapie a été effectivement interrompue à ces dates.Méthodes : Une étude d’observation de six mois a été menée du 3 octobre 2005 au 31 mars 2006, dans une unité de soins intensifs médico-chirurgicale de 27 lits d’un hôpital de soins tertiaires. Des pharmaciens cliniciens participaient aux tournées quotidiennes et ont répertorié de façon prospective les patients admissibles à l’étude. Un pharmacien investigateur a calculé de façon rétrospective les scores d’infection pulmonaire clinique. D’autres données ont aussi été collectées de la base de données sur l’amélioration de la qualité et des dossiers médicaux des patients de l’unité de soins intensifs.Résultats : En tout, 92 patients ont reçu une antibiothérapie pour une pneumonie sous ventilation assistée au cours de la période de l’étude, et 49 d’entre eux ont été retenus aux fins d’analyse. Au jour 3, 17 (35 %) des 49 patients étaient admissibles à un arrêt précoce de l’antibiothérapie, mais on a procédé à l’arrêt de l’antibiothérapie chez seulement 2 (12 %) de ces 17 patients. Au jour 7, 10 patients (32 %) sur 31 étaient admissibles à l’arrêt de l’antibiothérapie, mais on a interrompu l’antibiothérapie chez seulement 1 (10 %) de ces 10 patients.Conclusions : L’établissement des auteurs se prêterait particulièrement bien à l’élaboration et la mise en place d’une politique d’arrêt de l’antibiothérapie, qui se fonderait sur les scores d’infection pulmonaire clinique dans les cas de pneumonie sous ventilation assistée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207