Bulk fatigue damage evolution in polyamide‐6 and in a polyamide‐6 nanocomposite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical response of a polyamide‐6 montmorillonite clay nanocomposite and of a polyamide‐6 was monitored during axial fatigue tests performed at R‐ratios of 0.1 and −1. For both materials, two transitions were usually observed in the evolution of all the stress‐strain‐time parameters studied after similar numbers of loading cycles, suggesting interrelationships between the mechanisms of molecular reorganization. Fatigue test monitoring indicated an initial decrease in the storage modulus and a subsequent trend for this modulus to increase, especially in polyamide‐6. During all tests, a partially recoverable strain was accumulated because of viscoelastic deformation. Nanoparticles reduced this strain in the initial cyclic straining regime but not in the last regime, probably because such particles cannot inhibit viscoelastic events constrained in a volume larger than their interaction volume within the matrix. Based on the accumulated volume variation measured, the nucleation and growth of microvoids can be expected to occur in the last cyclic straining regime. POLYM. COMPOS., 26:636–646, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".