MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056108737 · doi:10.2118/05-05-03

Pore-Scale Visualization of Foamed Gel Propagation and Trapping in a Pore Network Micromodel

2005· article· en· W2056108737 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura Romero‐Zerón, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicromodelPorous mediumMaterials sciencePorosityVolume (thermodynamics)Enhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringComposite materialChemical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes an experimental study carried out using a transparent etched glass micromodel to investigate the complex fl ow of foamed gel in porous media at pore level. Foamed gels can be used as mobility control or blocking agents to minimize excessive gas or water production in oil reservoirs. Although the use of foamed gels as an enhanced oil recovery process has been studied for some time, the mechanisms of foamed gel flow and trapping in porous media are not so clear. In this work, the influence of foamed gel microstructure on its propagation in porous media and the effect of the configuration of gas bubbles and liquid phase (gel) inside the micromodel on blockage effectiveness were evaluated through visual observation in a transparent etched glass micromodel. The experimental observations demonstrate that foamed gel presents better characteristics for fluid profile modification and therefore superior fluid diversion capability than conventional aqueous foams. Micromodel visualization and videotaped data of foamed gel propagation through the etched glass micromodel indicated efficient residual oil mobilization. Image and statistical analysis showed that foam bubbles are reshaped during propagation through porous media. The final configuration of trapped foamed gel bubble and liquid phase (gel) inside the pore space indicated an important role in the effectiveness of fluid flow restriction. Introduction Foams have been applied broadly as mobility control and blocking agents in oil and gas reservoirs. Conventional aqueous foam is a surfactant-stabilized dispersion of a relatively large volume of gas in a small volume of a liquid. In porous media, foam is generated when a liquid containing a foaming agent is mixed with either an externally injected or an in situ gas(1), with the gas occupying typically 50 % to 99 % of the total volume. Foam mobility measured in porous media is many orders of magnitude smaller than that of the constituent gas(2). This mobility reduction is achieved primarily because the gas phase is dispersed into bubbles, which are generally about the size of the pore channels(2). Additionally, fl owing lamellae encounter significant drag because of the presence of pore walls and constrictions(3). This performance makes foams suitable for three potential applications:mobility control, improving the displacement efficiency of gas drive processes;mobility control and flow impediment, improving the sweep efficiency of other fluid injection processes; and,partial or total pore blockage, restricting the flow of undesired fluids and plugging of high permeable oil "thief" zones(4). Performance of foam that is already capable of strong mobility control may be further improved by the addition of suitable polymer or gelant(5). Incorporating polymers into a foaming solution affects foam properties primarily by increasing the liquid phase viscosity, which enhances foam stability minimizing gas bubble coalescence by decreasing the rate of drainage and reducing the rate of interbubble gas diffusion(6, 7). The stability and performance of polymer-thickened foams can be additionally enhanced by crosslinking the polymer in the aqueous phase of the foam. A foamed gel is created by means similar to those used for aqueous foam generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207