MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056135682 · doi:10.1049/ip-epa:20000066

DSP-based indirect-current-controlledSTATCOM. Part 1: Evaluation ofcurrent control techniques

2000· article· en· W2056135682 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Electric Power Applications · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationControl theory (sociology)Current (fluid)Insulated-gate bipolar transistorStatic VAR compensatorDigital signal processingComputer scienceInverterDirect currentElectronic engineeringAC powerFilter (signal processing)VoltageEngineeringControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DSP-based implementation of a 3-phase static compensator (STATCOM) is presented. The closed-loop control scheme of the compensator is based on fuzzy logic. The hardware module of an IGBT-based PWM current-controlled voltage-source-inverter (PWM-CC-VSI) is taken as a STATCOM. Two different types of current control techniques, namely, direct and indirect current control are designed for the compensator. The experimental tests on the compensator are carried out with both techniques. The STATCOM is tested as an active filter (AF) to select the most promising technique for the current control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it