MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056152291 · doi:10.1097/ftd.0b013e3182272b10

CYP2D6 Polymorphisms and Codeine Analgesia in Postpartum Pain Management: A Pilot Study

2011· article· en· W2056152291 on OpenAlexaff
Sondra vanderVaart, Howard Berger, Johanna Sistonen, Parvaz Madadi, Ilan Matok, Violette Gijsen, Saskia N. de Wildt, Anna Taddio, Colin J.D. Ross, Bruce Carleton, Michael R. Hayden, Gideon Koren

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversitySt. Michael's HospitalChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodeineMorphineCYP2D6MedicineOpiateGenotypeAnesthesiaHydrocodoneAdverse effectPharmacogeneticsOpioidPharmacologyInternal medicineOxycodoneCytochrome P450BiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Codeine, a common opiate prescribed for pain postcesarean section (c-section), is biotransformed by the highly polymorphic Cytochrome P450 enzyme 2D6 (CYP2D6). Ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs), individuals with multiple active copies of CYP2D6, can biotranform up to 50% more codeine into morphine than normal individuals can. In contrast, poor metabolizers (PMs), individuals who have no active CYP2D6 genes, convert almost no codeine into morphine and as a result may take multiple doses of codeine without attaining analgesia. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study the relationship between CYP2D6 genotype and codeine analgesia among women recovering from c-section. METHODS: Forty-five mothers prescribed codeine provided a blood sample for CYP2D6 genotyping and recorded their pain level 4 times a day for 3 days immediately after a c-section. Codeine was used on an as-needed basis; doses and times were recorded. The relationship between CYP2D6 genotype, pain scores, need for codeine, and adverse events was studied. Theoretical morphine dose, based on CYP2D6 genotype, was estimated. RESULTS: Women at the genotypic extremes reported codeine effects consistent with their genotype: the 2 PMs of codeine reported no analgesia as a result of taking codeine, whereas 2 of the 3 UMs reported immediate pain relief from codeine but stopped taking it due to dizziness and constipation. Much larger numbers are needed to study similar correlations among extensive and intermediate metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the extreme CYP2D6 genotypes (PMs and UMs) seemed to predict pain response and adverse events. Larger sample sizes are needed to correlate the range of genotypes with pain response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207