Analysis of pFQ12, a 22.4-kb<i>Frankia</i>plasmid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frankia are gram-positive, filamentous bacteria capable of fixing atmospheric dinitrogen in symbiosis with a wide variety of woody plants and shrubs. Some isolates of Frankia harbor plasmids of 8.5 (pFQ11) and 22.4 kb (pFQ12) that have no known function but are transmitted through many generations in culture. We have sequenced the 22,437-bp pFQ12 plasmid that is present in isolates CpI1 and ArI3. This sequence, with 76% G+C, is almost totally unrelated to that of pFQ11 found in the same cells. However, four regions of identity, 40-90 bp each, are dispersed around the plasmids. The 22.4-kb plasmid has >50 open reading frames (ORFs) that encode putative proteins of more than 100 amino acids, with the largest being 2226 amino acids. Twenty of these ORFs are likely to encode proteins based on their codon bias as determined by two different algorithms. Transcripts from nine of these regions have been identified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or filter hybridization. The two Frankia plasmids each encode a protein similar to the korSA protein that regulates transmission of pSAM2 in Streptomyces. The origin of replication (ORI) region of pFQ12 was localized by intrastrand AT and GC equivalence switch. It includes a 40-bp, intergenic, A+T-rich region that has a strong identity in pFQ11.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".