Bibliographic record
Abstract
No contexto dos anos 1960, marcado por contestações culturais e rupturas ideológicas com paradigmas hegemônicos ocidentais, a Revolução Tranqüila do Quebec produziu profundas mudanças culturais, expressando contradições internas do ethos quebequense. Nesse quadro, a obra do escritor Réjean Ducharme é considerada a expressão do romance americano no Quebec. No jogo discursivo do romance Le nez qui voque, publicado em 1967, engendra-se a representação do abastardamento cultural nas Américas sob a forma de uma alegoria paródica da questão identitária do Quebec. Elaborado durante as profundas rupturas com as formas estruturais de poder, o romance articula identidade e extraterritorialidade na leitura da prática crescente de uma hibridização intercultural definida pelo nomadismo de imaginários diversos e complexos em trânsito em uma escrita também migrante. O processo inclui a territorialização do quebequense no continente americano, ou seja, a representação do referencial cultural identitário americano do quebequense e a inscrição de seu ethos no vocábulo americano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".