Frequency scanning study of sub-synchronous resonance in power systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a frequency scanning analysis for detecting the potential of subsynchronous resonance (SSR) in induction generator based wind farms. Two types of induction generator: single-cage and double-cage based wind farms are considered. The wind farms are connected to modified IEEE First Benchmark and IEEE Second Benchmark System. Detailed positive sequence model of the study systems are developed and frequency scanning is carried out by calculating effective impedance looking from the rotor circuit of the induction generators. It is found that induction generator based wind farms are quite susceptible to SSR due to induction generator effect when they are connected to IEEE First Benchmark System. In this case, SSR may occur at realistic levels of series compensation if the wind farms employ double-cage induction generators. Incidentally, no SSR phenomenon is found in wind farms which are connected to IEEE Second Benchmark System. The frequency scanning results are compared and validated with eigenvalue analysis. Hence, frequency scanning technique can be successfully utilized for initial investigation of any potential for SSR in wind farms connected to a series compensated transmission line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it