MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056246771 · doi:10.1002/joc.1743

Initial soil moisture as a predictor of subsequent severe summer weather in the cropped grassland of the Canadian Prairie provinces

2008· article· en· W2056246771 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John Hanesiak, An Tat, R. L. Raddatz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Climatology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGrasslandVegetation (pathology)Water contentGrowing seasonClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesMoistureHydrology (agriculture)MeteorologyGeographyGeologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soil moisture, along with the type and stage of the vegetation, influences the thermodynamic structure of the atmosphere by regulating heat and moisture fluxes in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). This study examined whether the modelled aerial‐average root‐zone soil moisture (RzSm) in ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ areas of the cropped grassland of the Canadian Prairie provinces had predictive value in determining if these areas would subsequently have above‐ or below‐normal occurrences and event days of severe summer convective weather (i.e. tornadoes, hail, heavy rains, and/or strong winds). RzSm, simulated by the Prairie Agro‐climate Model, for the 1997–2003 growing seasons was analyzed three times per season. Dry areas with RzSm ⩽50% of available water holding capacity (AWHC) and wet areas with RzSm > 50% of AWHC were delineated post‐snowmelt, on 15th June, and on 15th July. The aerial‐average RzSm levels in the dry and in the wet areas were calculated, and plotted against the relative number of occurrences and number of event days that were recorded during the remainder of the growing season for the various types of severe summer convective weather. In each case, the best‐fit linear regression line and the variance that it explained ( r 2 value) were computed. The hypothesis that the slope of each regression line was significantly different from zero was then tested. A value of r 2 close to or greater than 0.25 was arbitrarily used as a cut‐off point—a relationship with an r 2 close to or greater than this value, and with a regression line slope that was significantly different from zero, was selected as one which could have potential value in the climatological forecasting of severe summer convective weather. For most of the severe weather types, the relative number of occurrences and the relative number of event days, which were recorded subsequent to the three dates on which the aerial‐average RzSm was determined were greater in the wet areas than in the dry areas. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ClimatologySame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207