MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2056266854 · doi:10.1149/2.099404jes

An Investigation of the C-Zn System as Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Materials

2014· article· en· W2056266854 on OpenAlexafffund
Mary Irene Purcell, T. D. Hatchard, R. J. Sanderson, M. N. Obrovac

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnodeNanocrystalline materialFaraday efficiencyMaterials scienceElectrolyteLithium (medication)Carbon fibersAmorphous solidChemical engineeringBattery (electricity)ElectrodeSputteringIonThin filmInorganic chemistryChemistryNanotechnologyComposite materialCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The C-Zn system was investigated for use as anode materials for Li-ion cells. Thin films of the entire composition range were made by combinatorial sputtering. The grain size of Zn was reduced and became nanocrystalline as the carbon content in the film increased. Sputtered films rich in amorphous carbon were found to have a high capacity, corresponding to the formation of Li 0.5 C during lithiation, confirming previous studies. The presence of Zn was found to significantly reduce the irreversible capacity and improve cycle life over that of pure carbon films. However, Zn was also found to catalytically decompose electrolyte at the electrode surface during cycling, resulting in poor coulombic efficiency. This brings into doubt the usefulness of Zn as a component of anode materials for Li-ion cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical Society→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→