MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056276753 · doi:10.2174/187221207782411629

Review of Electrochemical Technologies for Environmental Applications

2007· article· en· W2056276753 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecent Patents on Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocoagulationWastewaterSewage treatmentPollutantOrganic matterElectrochemistryAnodeWaste managementSuspended solidsMaterials scienceProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceElectrodeEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review deals with electrochemical methods for water, wastewater, wastes and soils treatment. The electrochemical technique combines both physical chemistry and electronic science and has widely proved to be a clean, flexible and powerful tool for the development of new methods for waste and water treatment. Likewise, electrochemical treatment is generally characterized by simple equipment, ease of operation, short retention time and negligible equipments for adding chemicals. Besides, electrolytic cells can be easily automated and coupled with other processes including, biological, chemical and physical processes to enhance the efficiency of the treatment. A particular focus is given to electrocoagulation (EC), electrodeposition (ED), electroflotation (EF), electrokinetic (EK) and electrooxidation (EO) processes. These technologies are effective in improving the treatment quality of industrial wastes, wastewaters and drinking water on integration into a treatment plant or replacement of conventional processes that are found to be less effective to eliminate specific organic and inorganic pollutants. EC can be used for clarifying water or to eliminate organic, inorganic and microbial pollutants from wastewater. The technology delivers in situ coagulant by anodic dissolution of sacrificial electrodes (aluminium or iron) and is finding wider applications with the possible improvements in the reduction of energy consumption and metallic sludge production. ED is a well-established process for toxic metal removal whose effectiveness can be greatly improved by selecting suitable electrode material (type and geometry of the electrode). EF technology is effective in removing suspended solids, colloidal particles and oil & grease suspension. EK technology is a promising method to remove toxic metals from the matter with low hydraulic permeability or to enhance dewaterability of wastes including soils and sludge. The development of new, more stable and active catalytic electrodes has led to a renewed interest in EO for degrading refractory organic pollutants. This paper covers both established and recent developments in the field of electrochemical technologies for waste, water and wastewater treatment based on more than 158 patents and publications cited or analyzed. Keywords: Electrocoagulation, electrodeposition, electroflotation, electrokinetic, electrooxidation, electrodes, pollutants, wastes, water, wastewater

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it