MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056306510 · doi:10.1117/12.2080116

Ultralow threshold electrically injected AlGaN nanowire ultraviolet lasers on Si

2015· article· en· W2056306510 on OpenAlexaff
Kwai Hei Li, Xiao Liu, Songrui Zhao, Qi Wang, Zetian Mi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLasing thresholdOptoelectronicsNanowireLaserLaser linewidthMolecular beam epitaxyUltravioletSubstrate (aquarium)Semiconductor laser theoryWavelengthSemiconductorEpitaxyOpticsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultraviolet (UV) lasers are of paramount importance for applications in water purification, diagnosis and bio-agent detection. Here we report that, with the use of dislocation-free AlGaN nanowires formed directly on Si substrate, electrically injected UV emission in the wavelength range from 319 nm to 335 nm can be readily achieved, which is the shortest wavelength range ever reported for electrically injected semiconductor lasers. In this work, catalyst-free AlGaN nanowire arrays are grown directly on Si substrate by radio frequency plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Our detailed calculation shows that such vertically aligned randomly distributed sub-wavelength scale nanowire array can sustain random lasing action. Various lasing peaks from 319 nm to 335 nm can be measured from such AlGaN nanowire samples under electrical injection. The threshold is measured to be in the range of tens of A/cm<sup>2</sup> at cryogenic temperature, which is significantly smaller than the commonly reported GaN-based quantum well lasers. The measured linewidth is as narrow as 0.2 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207