MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative Minimal Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations of Four Fluoroquinolones Against Ocular Isolates of Haemophilus influenzae

2007· article· en· W2056311570 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Hedlin, Joseph M. Blondeau

Bibliographic record

VenueEye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaemophilus influenzaeMicrobiologyMinimum inhibitory concentrationMutantDrugDrug resistanceVirologyMedicineBiologyPharmacologyAntibioticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Haemophilus influenzae is a known ocular pathogen, particularly in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) values of third-generation (i.e., ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) and fourth-generation (i.e., gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin) fluoroquinolone antibiotics against clinical ocular isolates of H. influenzae. METHODS: Twenty-six clinical isolates of H. influenzae were evaluated. For MIC testing, approximately 10(5) colony-forming units/mL of test organism was added to an H. influenzae test medium containing twofold dilution increments of each fluoroquinolone. Cultures were incubated for 18 to 24 hours at 35 degrees C to 37 degrees C in 5% CO2. The lowest drug concentration that prevented growth was recorded as the MIC. The lowest drug concentration that inhibited 90% of strains tested was recorded as the MIC90. To determine MPC values, more than 10(10) bacteria were inoculated to agar plates containing varying drug concentrations and incubated for 24 to 48 hours at 35 degrees C to 37 degrees C in 5% CO2. To confirm MPC values, bacteria isolated from drug-containing plates were subcultured to drug-free agar, incubated, and then subcultured to a plate with the same drug concentration. The lowest drug concentration that allowed no growth was recorded as the MPC. RESULTS: All tested fluoroquinolones were highly active against H. influenzae. The MIC90 values were 0.016 microg/mL for gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin and 0.031 microg/mL for moxifloxacin and ofloxacin. The MPC90 values were 0.125 microg/mL for gatifloxacin and 0.5 microg/mL for moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: All evaluated fluoroquinolones were effective against H. influenzae. The MIC90 and MPC90 values for gatifloxacin were consistently lower than those for moxifloxacin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical PracticeSame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207