MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056352329 · doi:10.1080/15326340600649045

Spectral Polynomial Algorithms for Computing Bi-Diagonal Representations for Phase Type Distributions and Matrix-Exponential Distributions

2006· article· en· W2056352329 on OpenAlexaff
Qi‐Ming He, Hanqin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueStochastic Models · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsMathematicsDiagonalExponential functionType (biology)Diagonal matrixMatrix exponentialPhase-type distributionMatrix (chemical analysis)Matrix polynomialExponential typePolynomialAlgorithmCombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysisPure mathematicsExponential distributionGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop two spectral polynomial algorithms for computing bi-diagonal representations of matrix-exponential distributions and phase type (PH) distributions. The algorithms only use information about the spectrum of the original representation and, consequently, are efficient and easy to implement. For PH-representations with only real eigenvalues, some conditions are identified for the bi-diagonal representations to be ordered Coxian representations. It is shown that every PH-representation with a symmetric PH-generator has an equivalent ordered Coxian representation of the same or a smaller order. An upper bound of the PH-order of a PH-distribution with a triangular or symmetric PH-generator is obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStochastic ModelsSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207