The Other Side of Nowhere: Jazz, Improvisation, and Communities in Dialogue (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: The Other Side of Nowhere: Jazz, Improvisation, and Communities in Dialogue Michael Borshuk Daniel Fischlin and Ajay Heble, eds. The Other Side of Nowhere: Jazz, Improvisation, and Communities in Dialogue. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 2004. 439 pp. us $29.95 cloth. Having been fortunate enough to participate twice in the Guelph Jazz Festival Colloquium, I can testify to the annual event's importance as a forum for critical exchange. On a broad level, as a music festival Guelph is—as Globe and Mail jazz writer Mark Miller famously called it—visionary, an occasion that eschews the commercialism of other music gatherings and instead privileges underexposed artists, those less likely to command a cover feature in Down Beat magazine or enjoy "crossover" success. While main stages in other Canadian jazz festivals over the past few years have tended to showcase pop singers like, say, Al Green or Aaron Neville, Guelph's program has featured challenging improvisers like Archie Shepp, Susie Ibarra, and Oliver Lake. In 2003, the Guelph festival premiered the jazz opera, Quebecité, a collaboration by the poet George Elliot Clarke and the jazz pianist and composer D.D. Jackson. Needless to say, Guelph's organizers strive to rediscover potential in the jazz festival format, offering a stimulating platform for artists who defy market categorization or do not lend themselves easily to promotional tie-ins. (A glossy Misha Mengelberg calendar? Myra Melford on a Chrysler commercial? Both unlikely.) Accordingly, the festival's annual interdisciplinary colloquium on jazz and improvisation embodies that combination of rigor and imagination. The colloquium thrives on intersection and surprise, resisting convention by bringing together scholars, artists, and scholar-artists in dialogue. On my first visit to the colloquium in 1997, I sat on an academic panel chaired by pianist Marilyn Lerner and featuring saxophonist Jane Bunnett as a respondent. In 1999, I enjoyed papers and talks by notable academics like Ingrid Monson and Charles Keil, as well as novelist-poet-critic Nathaniel Mackey, and percussionist Eddie Prévost. (At one point, I was thrilled to discover that bassist-composer William Parker was sitting across the aisle from me during one of the discussions.) In short, the colloquium offers a space in which jazz and improvisation are validated as objects deserving of academic attention, but it does so without rehearsing facile divisions between culture and exegesis. At Guelph, improvisation is the topic of discussion but also a means for discussion, recognized as a form of critical inquiry in and of itself. [End Page 349] In The Other Side of Nowhere, editors Daniel Fischlin and Ajay Heble—both of whom are professors at the University of Guelph, and the latter the Guelph Festival's artistic director—collect an expansive and provocative set of essays that embody the festival's spirit. This is a book destined to become a standard in jazz scholarship. The volume's comprehensiveness places it in line with a number of valuable interdisciplinary collections from the past decade, including Krin Gabbard's Jazz Among the Discourses (Duke UP, 1995) and Representing Jazz (Duke UP, 1995), and Robert O'Meally's The Jazz Cadence of American Culture (Columbia UP, 1998) and Uptown Conversation: The New Jazz Studies (edited with Brent Hayes Edwards and Farah Jasmine Griffin, Columbia UP, 2004). Heble and Fischlin's effort complements those collections in its examination of the political and aesthetic importance of jazz, especially as an influence on American culture (the ubiquitous "cadence" that O'Meally names in his 1998 title). But The Other Side of Nowhere also constitutes an important and timely intervention by considering, in broader terms, the significance of the music's characteristic improvisatory aesthetic. This anthology repeatedly suggests, for example, how group musical improvisation constitutes not just an analogy for democratic idealism but the embodiment of democratic practice and a potential vehicle for "real" social transformation. One of the unspoken tenets of the Guelph colloquium is a faith in improvisation's emancipatory promise. Improvisation, as many of the writers in the anthology remind us, demands a willingness to reconsider existing patterns but also depends on a familiarity with convention. Jazz, even its freest forms, cannot completely step away from previous frames of reference, and rarely even...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".