MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056369273 · doi:10.3166/acsm.33.339-350

Etude structurale et spectroscopique de l’apatite : Na<sub>1,69</sub>Pb<sub>8,31</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>5,76</sub>(HPO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>0,24</sub>(OH)<sub>0,55</sub>

2008· article· fr· W2056369273 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ilhem Tmar, Mohamed Ali Toumi, T. Mhiri

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRaman spectroscopyCrystallographyMineralogyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir d'une etude radiocristallographique sur poudre cristalline par la methode de Rietveld, nous avons montre que le compose Na 1,69 Pb 8,31 (PO 4 ) 5,76 (HPO 4 ) 0,24 (OH) 0,55 cristallise dans le systeme hexagonal, groupe d'espace P3. Les deux sites cationiques 2x(3d) (notes Pbl et Pb2), equivalents au site (6h) de P6 3 /m, sont totalement occupes par le plomb. Les sites (4f) de P6 3 /m se subdivisent en quatre sites non equivalents 2x(1c) + 2x(1b) dans P3. Trois de ces sites sont occupes a la fois par le sodium et le plomb, alors que le quatrieme est totalement occupe par le plomb. Les spectres de diffusion Raman et IR de ce compose ont ete etudies en detail sur la base de la theorie des groupes et par reference aux autres composes apatitiques. La presence des trois raies, sur le spectre Raman, vers 935, 960 et 973cm -1 et qui sont attribuees aux modes de vibration totalement symetriques v 1 (PO 4 ) confirment bien la baisse de symetrie observee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0090.017
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0090.005
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207