MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056373393 · doi:10.1117/1.3421554

Comparative study of the influence of the aspect ratio of trapezoidal index profiles on the performance of a fiber Raman amplifier

2010· article· en· W2056373393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of CalcuttaLakehead University
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyMaterials scienceRefractive indexOpticsContext (archaeology)Core (optical fiber)Step-index profileAmplifierCoaxialDispersion (optics)Optical fiberOptical amplifierGraded-index fiberOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysicsFiber optic sensorComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have sought a suitable coaxial refractive index profile with dispersion-flattened and dispersion-shifted criteria in the context of a single-mode Raman gain amplifier. We present a novel comparative study based on the effective core area and Raman gain coefficient in relation to the effect of aspect ratios of trapezoidal index profiles in the inner core on the Raman gain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it