MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056377904 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2001.0032

Harems of the Mind: Passages of Western Art and Literature (review)

2001· article· en· W2056377904 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Madeleine Dobie

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaremHistoryPower (physics)TurkishArtPhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

620 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION 13:4 Ruth Bernard Yeazell. Harems ofthe Mind: Passages of Western Art and Literature. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000. xii + 314pp. US$35.00. ISBN 0-300-08389-0. Harems of the Mind explores Europe's enduring fascination with the East, with a focus on one of the key components of this obsession, the representation of the harem or seraglio. As Ruth Bernard Yeazell explains in her introduction, in the European imaginary, the harem—the quarters reserved for women in many Moslem households—has often been conflated with the seraglio, the palace of the Sultan in Constantinople, with the result that all Moslem men have been presumed to practise polygamy and to live amid a cohort of willing concubines. As this slippage suggests, and as Yeazell demonstrates throughout her book, Europeans' lack of knowledge about the harem has often spurred on the desire to represent it. Harems ofthe Mind is ambitiously broad. It covers a period that begins with the defeat of the Turks before Vienna in 1683 and ends with the birth of the Turkish republic and the abolition of polygamy in the 1920s. It mainly examines the work of British and French writers and visual artists, but includes a few references to Italy and Germany. As the title suggests, Yeazell approaches these representations as "imaginative projections" (p. 8) or creative exercises. Unlike many critics who have written in recent years on this topic, she does not think that they are primarily expressions of power or imperial ambition. She does, on the other hand, acknowledge that depictions of polygamy and the harem have always been intertwined with European attitudes towards marriage and the relations between the sexes. The book is divided into six parts, each of which addresses one of the major themes around which Western representations of the Orient have been organized . The opening section examines the emphasis on optics—visual experience, eyewitness testimony, stolen glances—that necessarily accompanies the representation of an institution characterized by inaccessibility. Part 2 turns to the theme of confinement and liberation. It demonstrates that although for many Europeans, harems were nothing less than prisons, for others, notably Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Turkish life offered women freedoms and privileges lacking in Western Europe. Part 3 investigates "sex and satiety," charting European responses to polygamy that ranged from the pornographic explorations of the Lustful Turk (1828) to the wistful envy of James Boswell, and the famous assertion, made in Montesquieu's Lettres persanes (1721), that the Moslem male is like an athlete worn out by conjugal duties. Building on this foundation, part 4 shows the way in which many late eighteenth and early nineteenth-century works, including Marmontel's Contes moraux (1761) and Rossini's comic opera L'Italiana in Algeri (1813), assembled negative stereotypes of the harem to promote monogamy and the couple. Part 5 examines the representation ofemotional relationships in the harem. Here again Yeazell stresses diversity, showing that whereas in Bajazet (1672) Racine turned the harem into a "theater of Jealousy" (p. 172), other writers, including Delarivier Manley in Almyna: or the Arabian Vow (1706), celebrated the sisterly affection that blossomed there. This section also shows that REVIEWS 621 for some Victorian artists, notably the painter John Frederick Lewis, the harem signified home: a clean, orderly, secluded place far removed from the dirty, viceridden streets ofLondon. The final section addresses the temporality ofthe harem, defined primarily by European assertions of the timelessness of the Orient. Drawing on Ingres's Bain turc (1862-63), Yeazell suggests that the image ofthe timeless Orient has often been interwoven with the contemplation of death. The principal strengths of Harems of the Mind are its extraordinarily broad range of references (particularly to little-known works by women writers) and the clarity and elegance of Yeazell's prose. The author's impressive knowledge means that she is able to organize representations into coherent thematic groups, to identify the principal topoi of this corpus, and to compare and contrast representations in a manner that highlights both shared preoccupations and unexpected differences. These very strengths, however, are tied to some significant weaknesses . In her preface Yeazell notes that the book originated in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207