MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056407226 · doi:10.1080/21635781.2012.720961

Drivers of the Perceived Value of a Third-Location Decompression Program for Canadian Forces Personnel Returning From Afghanistan

2012· article· en· W2056407226 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark A. Zamorski, Bryan G. Garber

Bibliographic record

VenueMilitary Behavioral Health · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed Forces
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoluminescent dosimeterMilitary personnelPsychologyValue (mathematics)First responderApplied psychologyMedicineMedical emergencyPolitical scienceStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The drivers of the perceived value of third-location decompression (TLD) programs are unclear. For this study, 14,253 Canadian personnel completed evaluations at the end of a TLD program. Results showed that sociodemographic and military characteristics were weak predictors of the perceived value of TLD. Instead, satisfaction with 10 out of 13 aspects of the program was predictive of the perceived value of TLD. The strongest predictors were support for the general concept of TLD and satisfaction with the educational and rest-and-relaxation components of the program. It was concluded that support for the concept and satisfaction with key program components drive the perceived value of TLD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMilitary Behavioral HealthSame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207