MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056424540 · doi:10.1115/1.4006624

Robust Pose Estimation With an Outlier Diagnosis Based on a Relaxation of Rigid Body Constraints

2012· article· en· W2056424540 on OpenAlex
Yu Lin, Xiaowei Tu, Fengfeng Xi, Vincent Chan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierArtificial intelligenceAnomaly detectionPoseRigid bodyComputer sciencePoint (geometry)Relaxation (psychology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel outlier diagnosis method for robust pose estimation of rigid body motions from outlier contaminated 3D point measurements. Due to incorrect correspondences in a cluttered measuring environment, observed point data are contaminated by outliers, which are unusual gross errors that lie out of an overall error distribution. Standard least-squares methods for pose estimation are highly sensitive to outliers. For this reason, an outlier diagnosis method is developed to preprocess measured point data prior to pose estimation. This diagnosis method detects and removes outliers based on a relaxation method with rigid body constraints of a rigid body. Simulations and experiments prove the effectiveness and advantages of high breakdown point and ease of implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it