Structural basis of diversification of fungal retinal proteins probed by site‐directed mutagenesis of <i>Leptosphaeria</i> rhodopsin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous fungal genomes encode homologs of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), but only two fungal rhodopsins were overexpressed and characterized spectroscopically. Neurospora rhodopsin (NR) is a slow-cycling sensory rhodopsin-like protein, while Leptosphaeria rhodopsin (LR) is a BR-like proton pump. Recently, we found that a conservative replacement of the cytoplasmic proton donor Asp150 by Glu converts LR into an NR-like protein. In this work, we search for structural reasons for the dramatic differences in their photochemistry by mutating the hydrogen-bonding partner of Asp150 (Thr87) and three additional residues (Thr233, Asp248, and Gly271) selected by comparison of the primary structures of NR and LR. We conclude that while these residues may contribute to the differences between LR and NR, they are not crucial for the optimization of the Schiff base reprotonation by Asp150, and that the dramatic effect of the D150E mutation is not a simple result of the introduction of a bulkier glutamate sidechain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".